Category: Proficiology
Posted on September 30, 2020
The Scientific Method in Proficiology
In a sense, studying generic sentient beings is kind of like studying a fictional universe. There’s no obvious notion of accuracy or correctness – after all, a generic mind is not necessarily an accurate depiction of human psychology. The whole field seems kind of self-contained and any statement about the world of the generics frankly appears unfalsifiable, in the same way that theories about a fictional universe are impossible to disprove through experiment.
Why should we care about such fictional domains? When there are high stakes to explain or understand a phenomenon, we look toward science for answers. It is tempting to treat scientific concepts as concrete things that objectively exist, making scientific theories seem much more tightly grounded in reality than the aforementioned theories around fictional universes. But I argue that in many cases, the two are not all that different. Of course, I am not saying that scientific work is purely fictional. All bodies of science agree that statements must be tested against real-world observations in order to be taken seriously. However, there are many different ways to do scientific work, and by grouping these methods under a common name we are desensitizing ourselves to their differences. In pointing out these differences, I will show you how scientific theory can be more fantastical than we initially expect.
Updated on September 12, 2020
The Tale of the Generics
An introduction to a strange mind and how its scientific way of thinking created a model world populated by generic sentient beings, or “generics”.
My mind tries very hard to make me think like a scientist. On the one hand, subconscious processes constantly scan my thoughts for claims to prove or disprove. After spending a brief moment analyzing, my mind would either reward me with a stamp of approval, or it would play devil’s advocate and make a counterargument of some kind. I can’t confidently make a statement until it passes a battery of quality assurance tests. Even then, the words would come out of my mouth with a generous amount of uncertainty mixed in. On the other hand, my mind prevents me from taking anything at face value. It believes that every event has a cause; that every action has motives; that every belief has rationale behind it. Like a curious child, it would stop me in my tracks, point to something and ask why?. If I couldn’t keep up with this perpetual stream of why?‘s, I would be punished with a nagging sense of dissatisfaction lasting for weeks.
For the most part, this quirk of mine didn’t bother me too much. I suppose it made me a weirder person by forcing me to spend an unusual amount of time reading textbooks, watching educational YouTube videos, and aimlessly pacing around the neighborhood in deep thought. It probably also played a part in developing my affinity toward research papers and computer source code as opposed to news articles, essays or novels. But soon enough, I found a more serious problem. When I find myself in front of other people, I’d feel an uncomfortable urge to question the motives behind their every action. What did his words really mean? What is he trying to get out of this meeting? If I was unlucky, my worries over a friendly conversation would snowball into a frantic analysis of several imagined personalities, annotated by the solutions to various zero-sum games.
Against my better judgment, my mind decided to study some psychology and sociology in order to understand people better. My intensive studying brought me close to many great ideas, but as meaningful as the two subjects were I knew they couldn’t capture the intricate details of how a person thinks and acts. Besides, academic study clearly wouldn’t make me feel less uncomfortable in front of another person. In a stroke of luck, my mind one day decided to stop over-complicating every interaction I had with other people. It hadn’t given up its quest for answers; it instead chose to tackle the problem from a different angle. It was going to design a grossly simplified model of human society, and study that model instead. I was a little shocked by how bizarre this idea was, but I mostly just felt thankful for being able to talk to other people without having to analyze their every word.
From that point on, my mind would pull out an imaginary notebook and silently scribble away whenever I watched a movie, met another person, or sat idly in front of my computer listening to a nearby group of people having a passionate conversation. In my dreams, my mind would take out the notebook and summon the various creatures described in its pages. I later jokingly decided to call these creatures generic sentient beings (or generics for short). As my mind tirelessly worked on improving its model, I watched the generics gradually transform from mindless logicians to lively beings full of dreams and aspirations. They initially ignored each other and lived solitary lives, but eventually they started to share their experiences and identify themselves as members of a generic society. The more confused I felt with the real world and its ambiguous catch-all terms like equality, intelligence and love, the closer my mind grew to its world of generic sentient beings.
In a strange way, this model world lacked structure. Generics often thought or acted in alien ways that defied common sense. No two generics held the same beliefs, felt the same emotions or interpreted events in the same way. The generic society always wavered in its core values, never settling on a universal code of ethics. Nonetheless, this world fascinated my mind. Despite the unpredictability of the race as a whole, there were clear reasons behind every choice a generic made. There was always a motive behind a conscious act; a set of hopes and dreams explaining every moment of frustration and burst of excitement. It’s sometimes impossible to find and truly appreciate these reasons without an omniscient point of view; from the eyes of another generic, the truth tends to feel incomplete, superficial even. Still, this model world offered more clarity than one could ever hope to glean from the real world.
More importantly, my mind saw great potential hiding within the generic sentient beings. Their society functioned remarkably smoothly considering how dissimilar its members were. Though the generics always felt frustrated and misunderstood, they could still form meaningful friendships and cooperate toward bigger goals (albeit inefficiently). My mind was convinced that with very minimal outside influence, the generics can learn to drastically improve their own lives. A pair of generics could hold friendly conversations about their lives even if they fundamentally differed in their core values and beliefs. A closely knit group of generics would be sensitive enough to lift each other’s spirits in times of need, and daring enough to argue against each other when any member goes too far. When faced with a large problem, the generic society can feel reasonably confident that its minds will cooperate and eventually offer a solution. The generics would then agree to carry out the solution even if half of them believed in a radically different approach. I felt my mind shift gears as it began to search for the strategies needed to help the generics live up to their full potential. After spending all its time creating the model, my mind’s work had really just begun. Feeling a bit playful at the time, I coined a new word to describe my mind’s budding research into its model world: Proficiology.
At this point, my mind has taken so many notes that it’s starting to run low on imaginary notebooks. I think the time is ripe to transition to a digital notebook and introduce the generic sentient beings to other minds. I hope you’ll find generic lives just as fascinating as I did. Maybe you too will come up with great ways to improve the generic society. If I’m lucky, one of you might even create your own world of generic sentient beings, making generickind a truly interplanetary civilization. You don’t necessarily have to do anything though; my only goal here is to keep the tale of the generics alive and to keep our minds spinning.